Final Fantasy VII Rebirth - Features Trailer

Playing through part 1 at the moment and I am about 25 hours in. I also tried it when it was first released but stopped pretty early on because of too much filler content. Midgar is like 5-6 hours of gameplay in the original and I hear the remake is 30-40 hours. That says something. I still think it has too much filler, but the game does get better after a while. Some things are made better for being more fleshed out too.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
505
Didnt have feeling the games has abundance of filler content. It felt more like on-the-rails experience to me. But perhaps I just spent too much time with Owlcat games.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
1,273
Owlcat games doesn't feel like they are filled with filler to me because afaik there wasn't a kingmaker videogame before they made kingmaker and I haven't played the pen and paper pathfinder. With FFVII we have the original videogame for comparison. The original Midgar was also on rails but it wasn't nearly as long.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
505
Owlcat games doesn't feel like they are filled with filler to me because afaik there wasn't a kingmaker videogame before they made kingmaker and I haven't played the pen and paper pathfinder. With FFVII we have the original videogame for comparison. The original Midgar was also on rails but it wasn't nearly as long.
With both Kingmaker and Wrath of the Righteous you do have the original Pathfinder Adventure Paths (AP 6 and AP 13). If you use your definition of filler then you could say it does actually have a lot of filler...probably 90% of the locations/content don't exist in the AP's.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
3,470
Location
Sigil
With both Kingmaker and Wrath of the Righteous you do have the original Pathfinder Adventure Paths (AP 6 and AP 13). If you use your definition of filler then you could say it does actually have a lot of filler...probably 90% of the locations/content don't exist in the AP's.
Alright but I didn't play them so I'm unaware of the filler. Thats the difference.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
505
Playing through part 1 at the moment and I am about 25 hours in. I also tried it when it was first released but stopped pretty early on because of too much filler content. Midgar is like 5-6 hours of gameplay in the original and I hear the remake is 30-40 hours. That says something. I still think it has too much filler, but the game does get better after a while. Some things are made better for being more fleshed out too.
I don't recall exactly how long Midgar is in the original, but I seem to remember it being significantly longer than just 5-6 hours.

It's nice that they fleshed out the remake as much as they have, but they should have made the first part less linear at an earlier point in the game. That seems to be the single biggest complaint I keep seeing about it. I wonder how many people quit playing because they didn't know that it becomes much more open later on.
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
42,887
Location
Florida, US
I don't recall exactly how long Midgar is in the original, but I seem to remember it being significantly longer than just 5-6 hours.

It's nice that they fleshed out the remake as much as they have, but they should have made the first part less linear at an earlier point in the game. That seems to be the single biggest complaint I keep seeing about it. I wonder how many people quit playing because they didn't know that it becomes much more open later on.
Yeah you're right, the first time I played it was probably closer to double that time.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
505
Owlcat games doesn't feel like they are filled with filler to me because afaik there wasn't a kingmaker videogame before they made kingmaker and I haven't played the pen and paper pathfinder. With FFVII we have the original videogame for comparison. The original Midgar was also on rails but it wasn't nearly as long.
Ever hear of that movie, Pirates of the Carribean? The movie is something like 90 minutes, but the ride is only about 5 minutes! Talk about filler! ;)

FF7R adds a lot of depth to the game. You find out more about the side characters. You find out more about Shinra. You find out a lot more about Aerith. Oh, and there are more battles - way more battles! And some really good boss fights. And some... sidequests.... ugh. OK, so a bunch of the sidequests are filler. And the extra-long sewer section. (Though getting hit with the frog spell late in the sewer was awesome. Every character gets a custom frog!)
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
8,451
Location
Kansas City
I don't mind sidequests at all since they're optional. I also like the added depth to characters. What I don't like is the sewer-section you mentioned as well as some other non-optional locations that just are made longer compared to the original game and doesn't add to the story. I think the game would have been better without the lengthening of those locations. It's stilla very good game though. It's an 8 out of 10 for me right now.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Messages
505
Back
Top Bottom