Carnifex
SasqWatch
Oh I'm sure we'll see cabinet melt-downs again, similar to the first time around. It's still a relatively new administration, give it some time for psyche fatigue to set in and the whirling cabinet will engage.
I'm actually pretty pissed right now. I had several buy orders that were very close to being filled and would have been great bargains. Now it's back to the waiting game...Yeah, seems like his cabinet managed to talk sense into him. Just look at the stock markets! What a roller coaster! I had placed a bid on NVIDIA stocks at 95$. If I had placed 98$ instead, I would have won 10$ per stock already. He made the stock market world's biggest casino10 minutes away and the situation changes entirely.
Also this shows that approximately 10% tariffs on most countries except China is their goal/strategy as the analysts said I was referring to in a post above. Anything over that is Trump show. Everything points to that at least 10% tariffs will stay once this shit show is over."I have authorized a 90 day PAUSE, and a substantially lowered Reciprocal Tariff during this period, of 10%, also effective immediately," Trump posted on Truth Social just before the market lifted off. Trump also said in the post that the US would be raising its tariffs on China to 125%.
It's tough to be stingyI'm actually pretty pissed right now. I had several buy orders that were very close to being filled and would have been great bargains. Now it's back to the waiting game...
Or perhaps the threat worked exactly as planned as 70 countries ran to the negotiating table and now have a 90 day deadline to complete negotiations. Nobody here will admit to that, I'm sure.Now he just announced a 90 pause on all tariffs except for China. This guy can't make up his mind.
Are you really going to pretend that he had that planned from the beginning? I think it's a lot more realistic that he was talked into doing it (the pause) within the past few days due to how badly the markets were tanking and the panic it was creating.Or perhaps the threat worked exactly as planned as 70 countries ran to the negotiating table and now have a 90 day deadline to complete negotiations. Nobody here will admit to that, I'm sure.
You really ought to think a bit before you type. As soon as you roll out "unjust", you've clearly completely missed how business works. "Bullying or blackmail" I just might grant you. Probably overstating and clearly overly emotional, but not bleeding heart nonsense like "unjust" in this context. As for Russia, they're already tariffed into oblivion. You might remember crucifying Trump for even bringing tariff relief into the Ukraine negotiation, but you've clearly ignored the fact that Biden's sanctions (a liberal word for tariff, in this case) which you loved with all your heart weren't unwound by Trump at this point. Other than that rather critical detail, you nearly got it right.I think you are rather confused; many of the Trump imposed tariffs are unjust and are form of bullying or blackmail. Asking Europe to buy 350 billion in energy is insane and they won't do it. Canada Tariff were for the most part unjust and pointless bullying. Probably to an extent the tariff on china was reasonable (though perhaps not the extent levied) and did you notice that NO tariff was placed on Russia - not even a token one while very large tariff were placed on vietnam (and numerous similar countries) not to mention a deserted island (if we ignore the penguins)...
Since it's the exact same play that he ran successfully on Mexico and Canada just a couple months ago, yes I will "pretend" that it's the exact same intentional play that he ran successfully and so far it's looking successful yet again.Are you really going to pretend that he had that planned from the beginning? I think it's a lot more realistic that he was talked into doing it (the pause) within the past few days.
Hope you didn't change your investments, my friend.Um...no. I guarantee we haven't seen the bottom of the markets yet.
"So far" meaning a single afternoon?Since it's the exact same play that he ran successfully on Mexico and Canada just a couple months ago, yes I will "pretend" that it's the exact same intentional play that he ran successfully and so far it's looking successful yet again.
Why would I do that? If someone has to change their investments, they weren't good in the first place.Hope you didn't change your investments, my friend.![]()
I say "so far" since just because everyone sprinted to the negotiating table doesn't guarantee successful agreements within 90 days. I expect things will work out fine overall but I'm not going to count those chickens just yet. With all the hyenas and gleeful second-guessers around here, throwing the parade prematurely would be unwise."So far" meaning a single afternoon?
Of course the markets are going to spike on that news. It's nothing more than poorly disguised manipulation. There will still be significant volatility in the coming months, and the overall health of our economy remains to be seen. Anyone claiming it's already a success only sounds like a bleating sheep.
Why would I do that? If someone has to change their investments, they weren't good in the first place.
Not really that challenging at all to defend something that's working. I wouldn't call it "genius" (seems a bit of "elephant gun for a fly" to me but I'm just a dumbass engineer, not an economist) but I don't let Trump Derangement Syndrome force me to blindly condemn a successful strategy, either.It takes some serious mental somersaults to defend repeatedly playing Chicken with the economy. Yeah... genius... that's it.
I'm guessing you're not an investor.edit- well, I see you tried. easy come, easy go, I guess.
No worries. Wasn't really busting your chops beyond razzing you a bit for saying the market hadn't bottomed when it appears that (at least for the near term) it has, just like I stated. I don't meddle in the specifics of others' finances. FWIW, I've got no investments beyond 401k's and a personal IRA so saying I'm not an investor is a fair statement, not that it really matters.I'm guessing you're not an investor.
I mentioned having some buy orders. That's not changing my investments or strategy in any way other than simply adding shares. I add to my positions when the market dips.
*Edit* I realize you wouldn't have any way of knowing what my buy orders were for since I didn't specify. They were all for stocks and ETFs that I already own.
