A House of Many Doors - Reflections

[Myrthos]

Harry Tuffs looks back on the release of A House of Many Doors last week and mentions the lack of press exposure, so here is some:

So A House of Many Doors launched just over a week ago. I'm still reeling.

I'd hoped for a break after releasing the game, but instead I've found myself working just as hard as before.

Once the hubbub dies down I'd like to collate my thoughts on HOMD into a longer, polished blog post that I might put up on GamaSutra or somewhere. This isn't that. This isn't an official postmortem - you can't reflect on an event when it's still ongoing. These are rougher notes, crumpled and hasty and ill-considered, scrawled from a foxhole as more bug-reports explode overhead.

The Good:

• Art, music, writing, atmosphere, setting and characters: Everyone loves all of these. I knew the first two would be successes, because Catherine and Zach are living gods, but I'm glad my writing has also received a lot of enthusiasm. This is good news - it's much easier to patch out bugs than it would be to improve on any of these!
• The game has a 'Very Positive' rating on Steam, which I'm chuffed about. People warned me that the Steam forums were a strange and hostile place, but my experience has been the opposite - the vast majority of people there have been lovely. Thanks are due to all of 'em.
• I've had a flood of hugely affectionate tweets and emails from people who love the game's story. I've had fanart of a dancing kinetopede, tweets from people saying the game was the first to make them cry, snippets of my writing have been cut out and pasted around with delight... After months of lonely toil, it's been a real treat to see people engage like that.
• It was fantastic to work in Failbetter's offices and get to know them so well. They're lovely, lovely people and I learned a huge amount - much more than I would have on my own. Friends!

The Bad:

• It was a buggy launch. In retrospect I really wish I'd opted for 1-2 weeks of Steam's Early Access program . HOMD is a massive game - it has more characters, locations and quest branches in it than the vast majority of AAA RPGs. That's not me bragging, it's just numbers. There's a reason developers like Obsidian have a reputation for both massively intricate reactive storylines and lots of bugs: One often comes with the other. And those are AAA developers, with a fleet of dedicated QA testers! Given all the different possibilities in HOMD, as a solo dev I was never going to be able to test all branches of every quest without delaying the game for another six months, which I couldn't afford to do. I cut lots of content from the game, but I suspect the best thing would have been to cut more. Another lesson learned.
• BUT: I've released 16 patches since the game launched. The bugs that were present on launch day are gone. If you've been holding off from buying the game or playing it until the bugs were ironed out, now's your time.
• Finally: Lack of media attention. Apart from the always-great Rock Paper Shotgun, who posted a Wot I Think, the press has mostly ignored HOMD. I think that's a shame, and it's not for lack of marketing on my part - I had a specific marketing plan and worked hard on it for the last 4 months. But there's not much I can do at this point, so I need you to help spread the word that HOMD exists. If you happen to be on Tumblr, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, any other forums, or your local street corner, and the mood strikes you: Why not post a HOMD screenshot, or open up a discussion, or hold a sign over your head and scream at passers-by?

More information.

 

[Lucky Day]

ah, so this was released.

Has anyone played it? He is getting positive responses on steam.

 

[duerer]

Hmmm. Just started playing, and I'd say it is a curious beast.
Very text-heavy , very strange.

Hence it won't be caught with the mass gamers, that's for sure.
However - since it has text, and QUALITY text, and plays like a CYOA-book, I'd pursue open-minded literary forums, or book reviewer blogs / sites.

Who knows? Maybe HOMD might have some runaway success outside the gamer community, similar to the interactive fiction games nowadays.

 

[TheSHEEEP]

Hmmm. Just started playing, and I'd say it is a curious beast.
Very text-heavy , very strange.

Hence it won't be caught with the mass gamers, that's for sure.
However - since it has text, and QUALITY text, and plays like a CYOA-book, I'd pursue open-minded literary forums, or book reviewer blogs / sites.

Who knows? Maybe HOMD might have some runaway success outside the gamer community, similar to the interactive fiction games nowadays.

I don't think it is MUCH more text heavy than Sunless Sea, so it is definitely interesting for everyone who played that.

 

[you]

Is it good text or bad text ?

 

[duerer]

I don't think it is MUCH more text heavy than Sunless Sea, so it is definitely interesting for everyone who played that.

Methinks, Sunless Sea was also very text-heavy (remember, we are living in the '"cinematic gaming"-age...), however, it was truly unique by then.
Almost all reviewers of SS mentioned that you have to read a LOT, but it is worth.

... so is the case with a good book - not a looker, you must read a lot, and it might worth your time at the end.

 

[duerer]

Is it good text or bad text ?

In the first hour or so, it is good text. Hope the remaining hours will be fun as well.

Not an easy read though. It is more Clive Barker than, say, Stephen King, if you know what I mean.

 

[fadedc]

I was curious about this one after I read the review on RPS, but initial Steam reviews were kind of mixed which scared me off. Current reviews are better though, so maybe I'll give it another look.

 

[muhabor]

Sorry i am unable to dig it. I did not like sunless sea, i do not like HOTMD. It is because the atmosphere is heavy/grim, also i do not like encounters where outcome depends on unclear 50/50 dice roll