That's an understatement. I tried playing BaK earlier this year, but just couldn't get past the visuals. The game is so pixelated on my 24" monitor that I literally couldn't tell what I was looking at sometimes. I'm surprised that such a popular game has yet to receive a facelift.
Yeah I know but I like to think them as trilogy the second been an unofficial sequal.Betrayal at Antara isn't a sequel. BAK only had one sequel, Return to Krondor.
On the other hand BAA sucked. Not because it wasn't in the same setting, but because the plot was laughable and the protagonist was a whiny punk who I wanted to throttle every time he spoke. Still enjoyed the gameplay aspect and the bead chests were pretty cool, but the rest was just sad.
I'd go real old school and play Wizardry 1 or maybe Ultima 1. Too many people make great proclamations about cRPGs without being aware of the roots of the genre.
Ultima 2 was great! It was actually the first RPG I bought on my own when I got my original IBM PC.
But, yeah, by modern standards it's pretty simple.
I'd go real old school and play Wizardry 1 or maybe Ultima 1. Too many people make great proclamations about cRPGs without being aware of the roots of the genre.
Like both Heuristic Park games, W&W is a game that could have been great. The game stopper bug (vampire ring) along with scads of minor bugs bar this game from "great". And we won't even get started on the UberHorse. Unfortunate, because the game had potential out the ying-yang. DWB is great with game design but horrible with game development, as evident with both W&W and Dungeon Lords.a classic rpg that is just at the begining of the modern 3d gaming is wizards and warriors.
Great game.