[...] “One surprising finding was the role of sensitivity to rewards,” Abbas told PsyPost. “Contrary to expectations, students who were more sensitive to rewards were less likely to use generative AI. Another surprising finding was the positive relationship of generative AI usage with procrastination and self-reported memory loss – and negative relationship between generative AI usage and academic performance.” [...]
You reassure me; I thought I was the only one thinking that. I mean, it's obvious when you know all the people we can pay a few cent to solve captcha (check 20 - work as a captcha solver). They've only evolved to other tasks, like 'draw me a smiling Mona Lisa' or 'make a deepfake video of Musk fighting Zuckerberg'.Now I'm tempted to employ Occam's razor. Since we know humans can perform intelligent operations, the simplest and therefore most likely explanation for the current AI boom is that in truth there are humans (probably more than one) operating it.
pibbuR who now is relieved.