Ehm, you responded to this:
If you don't see CDPR being a special case here, then so be it.
I was specifically talking about CDPR being a special case - and I've done everything I can to make that being the point very, very clear. Are you awake?
Once again, it's ok if you don't agree.
Are you just being intentionally obtuse now? I honestly can't tell.
What is so confusing about what I said?
Nevermind… let's try somthing else here. How about you explain why CDPR is a "special case" as you put it.
No, I'm fully aware that several people are MORE aware of it in one case, than in another case.
But that would be my opinion.
Yeah, we're on a message board dedicated to the exchange of things like the things we're exchanging about.
Do we have to remind ourselves of that, or?
Anyway, can we agree that we're done here?
Cool