That's an interesting counter argument. I wonder just how much difference it would make though. There's still far too many people in jail.
OK, then let's send them all to Finland!!
Do you have good public transportation? If so, I'll move there if it's cold all the time!
There's this wonderfully distorted 60 minutes report on Finland ... land of depression. :lol:OK, then let's send them all to Finland!!
After stealing all your ill-gotten gains for the downtrodden, we have to go for whatever's left.I thought it was the right wing that was all about forcing morals on others. Well crap the bed, now I figure out that the lefties have stolen that from us, too.
There was no TV or internet.Why were executions public?
Uh, still no TV?Why are they still public in some countries?
Hah, now that's a good one.This is probably the sole instance where I'll give the French some kudos--a guillotine in the town square is tough to beat. If we add (doncha love modern technology) some heaters to the blade, we can get it hot enough to cauterize as it cuts and do away with the mess. What more could you ask for in an execution? Crisp and clean and 100% effective. To keep the bleeding hearts happy, we could use solar or wind power to generate the electricity for the heaters (I'm all about compromise).
The court processes in Finland stagger on their feet until cases become too old to hold them valid. EU has complained a couple of times how painfully slow the court cases are in this country. And the penalties indeed are extremely light especially if the sentenced has no previous criminal background.zakhal said:IIRC Finland many cases are solved through confess even in murder cases. We have light punishment though (somtimes too light even) so it makes people less resisting.
The court processes in Finland stagger on their feet until cases become too old to hold them valid. EU has complained a couple of times how painfully slow the court cases are in this country. And the penalties indeed are extremely light especially if the sentenced has no previous criminal background.
They're not doing much to pull on my heartstrings, especially this concept:Bernard Madoff has hired a veteran prison consultant to help him to find the best possible jail in which to serve his 150-year sentence for Wall Street’s biggest fraud.
The draconian maximum sentence imposed by the judge means that Madoff, 71, will be assigned to a tougher category of prison than most white-collar criminals...
A first-time non-violent white-collar criminal convicted in a US federal court would normally qualify for incarceration at a minimum-security “prison camp” with easygoing rules and no perimeter fence. But the length of Mr Madoff’s jail term means that he has no hope at all of going to one of them.
A sentence above 30 years usually places an inmate in a high-security category, meaning that Madoff would be assigned to a prison housing violent offenders including murderers and rapists..
Sorry if I sound barbaric, but I say SuperMax(23 hrs a day solitary confinement) for Mr. Madoff, for his own and society's best interests.“He has been incarcerated under very difficult conditions in these past months. Anywhere he goes is likely to be better than where he is now, unless they throw him into the Supermax,” he said. “He will be able to get exercise. He will be able to do something that makes him productive. He may be able to tutor other inmates.”
"Every officer along the way did his job," he said. "But we have 37,000 prisoners committed to prison in North Carolina and when those prisons get full, our jails start backing up. I run a jail. I know they can't put everyone in jail. They have alternative programs to incarceration. But there are some that just need to be in jail — and this is one who just needed to be in jail."