Your post was almost bearable until that line. I'll just assume that you were extremely tired when you typed it.
The deist and the agnostic position can use God as a possibility, but there are no agnostic or deist churches, no hierarchy structures or institutions. If a deist advocate God anyway, it's usually a sake of making sure others believe the same so that they do not have to feel like a loon. Or it can simply be that they find the idea of a creator so powerful that they cannot reject that idea. But neither is bothered if you do not believe in a God.
The recent movement within Judaism in which Judaism is seen as a "religion dissolver" is an approach I can subscribe to. In that tradition you should not speak G-d's name. You should not make images of G-d, and you shouldn't speak like you knew what G-d wants. So essentially, yes, there's a God, but it's not up to human beings to explain God. Taking care of other people and the world is what's important, not worshiping icons or pondering Gods rules.
But in general, the world religions that survived did so because they respond to human impulses, and it's always a human who responds, with a claim to be a messenger of a divine authority. Investigate every modern claim about God beyond that and it's rooted in some sort of subliminal message regarding submitting yourself to an authority, following rules. But there are of course believers that have taken the full cycle and removed themselves from the human hierarchy introduced by the bible, but still they will recognize the human institutions and titles (priests, imams etc) that is supposed to be their channel to God.
Investigate everything written about God, and it contains rules, delivered by people, about how to live your life. And it's always about human needs. Investigate Maslow's hierarchy of needs along with the world religions and you will see that each one of them mirror those needs, either by offering satisfaction or by manipulating them.
A creator wouldn't bother about human sexuality or human possessions... why? Because he/she made them. A creator is not interested in human worship. Why? Because all humans are his/hers regardless what they do. The premise of a religion that demands worship is fear of loosing control. No God that owns everything would have that fear.
Now look at western history.
The Gods of polytheistic traditions were probably just beloved heroes/ancestors who people begun to celebrate after their death, but multiple Gods were often assimilated to one that created new Gods. Those Gods were not like the monotheistic tradition which have always been about ultimate control, but there could be an occasional human sacrifice if one believed the Gods to be angry.
The tradition of unquestionable divine leadership begun with Egyptian Pharaos, although I do not doubt it was around earlier than that. Asian religions were often also about worshiping a lone person as a God. The emperors of the roman empire was also worshiped as a God.
The Hebrew God was developed after some high priests introduced a lawbook for Judah, which became Deuteronomy. Before Christianity, the punishment for not following Gods law was simply death, by human hand. Seemingly, that lawbook transfers the leaders power to an external entity, but by practice, this made the priests into leaders.
In Christianity the punishments for not following the rules is increased even more, now suggested to be eternal torment. Thanks to
Joh 15:6 it was still urged that apostates should be put to death by burning. With the Holy Spirit, Church became a part of God and even today, the pope is probably the greatest leader in the world. With the protestant tradition, the divine leader came back in form of a god-elected king. The tradition went on for awhile until the illusion was broken by an angry mob down in france.
The same scare-tactics about hell was used when the Quaran was introduced. God really had the same opinions as Muhammed, and if you didn't do what he said you can burn. Not to mention that the Quaran puts it into the hands of humans to get rid of other humans who do not follow the book.
To make sure it takes over, monotheism have always spoken to pride, boosting chauvinism and dehumanizing the outsiders.
The idea about being "chosen" was introduced with Judaism, the "chosen people". Throughout most of it's history, Christianity was dehumanizing against the rest. "Barbarians", the non-romans, were simply uncivilized. Pagans, with their animal-worship, were seen as animals and could as well be slaughtered like animals. Jews were seen almost as a pollution that had to be cleansed. Islam were little more than satan's forces. Calvinism refueled the idea that Christians were "chosen" where the rest were not, so why bother about treating them as humans? Calvinism is really the predecessor to social-Darwinism. In Social-Darwinism, the Calvinist perspective on God were simply replaced by "Chosen by nature".
In our times the dehumanizing process continues. Popular right now is the claim that non-Christians or non-believers have no morals, making them less than human.
