No one has used being an ex "Codexer" against me and I have gotten into quite a lot of arguments since I came here
That's because we think you might be a cute chick, and we don't want to scare you away.
No one has used being an ex "Codexer" against me and I have gotten into quite a lot of arguments since I came here
Thank you for thought policing but kindly take that attitude and, do whatever else you will with it. I'm doing it because it is a perfect reflection of the air towards Codexers here. This thread alone justifies it a hundred times. Your attitude justifies it. I'm this troll! Codexer out to eat your children! I must be mischievous and evil! Oooh!
Now you are being petulant. I have never thought that I will defend dte but dude! He wasn't trying to "thought police" you. He simply have blown your cover story. I know it hurts to find out that you are more transparent than you thought you are but hey, that's life!
Ooof, that had to hurt. Take a couple aspirin, maybe a shot of whiskey, and have a good laydown. If it doesn't look better in a couple days, we'll break out the penicillin.I have never thought that I will defend dte but dude!
Forgive us for misunderstanding your amazing homage, but we are mere mortals blinded by your razor wit. Or maybe you're just a little too obvious with the "innocent and oppressed" gambit… You've had your shining moment to rage against the machine; now it's time to show everyone that Mommy taught you a basic understanding of the concept of consideration. If necessary, I'm sure you can run upstairs and ask her for a refresher, champ.My "cover story". Right. Thanks for trying at second guessing me. Here's a suggestion: how about you just ask and I will explain. In fact, I already did. But you are desperate to demonize me.
NOW he is telling you what to do VotS! :lol:
Throwing in my 2 cents, if it is illegal in some countries to have that kind of imagery then it's got to go. Freedom of expression is all well and good, but if it could get somebody fired or in real trouble for just visiting this site then that expression is too much.
My one and only concern would be to anyone who is visiting this site. Yes, it sucks, but tell the world to change. Fat chance of that happening any time soon.
CountChocula said:RPGWatch is not a social club governed by Robert's Rules of Order and parliamentary procedure, but merely a private website maintained by its owners and volunteer moderators.
If they sent you a note kindly asking you to change your avatar, for whatever reason, why would you want to give them grief about it or complain publicly on the forum? Is this avatar pic so ingrained with your sense of identity that to give it up is so painful?
Which just goes to prove once again that you need to put the textbooks down and join the rest of us in the real world for a little bit. In the real world, they don't give two shits about engaging "in that discussion in our best capacity to do so". Sorry. In the real world, if you offend someone (particularly intentionally, as our new friend has done in this case), you are offered the opportunity to immediately remove the offending material, spend some quality time in Human Resources, and then followed by some quality time in sensitivity training. That's if you're lucky. For something like this, there's a good chance they'll just fire you outright. The real world doesn't have time for deep philosophical contemplation as we're too busy doing.While the Watch have it's own standard, as a general principle there are very good reasons behind "freedom of expression" as an absolute, meaning that there are no greyzones and the freedom of expression as a principle isn't up for discussion, distortion or exceptions. We are thus left with the argument why something is problematic and respect why someone would disagree and we all have a responsibility to engage in that discussion in our best capacity to do so.
That's because we think you might be a cute chick, and we don't want to scare you away.
Which just goes to prove once again that you need to put the textbooks down and join the rest of us in the real world for a little bit. In the real world, they don't give two shits about engaging "in that discussion in our best capacity to do so". Sorry. In the real world, if you offend someone (particularly intentionally, as our new friend has done in this case), you are offered the opportunity to immediately remove the offending material, spend some quality time in Human Resources, and then followed by some quality time in sensitivity training. That's if you're lucky. For something like this, there's a good chance they'll just fire you outright. The real world doesn't have time for deep philosophical contemplation as we're too busy doing.
What I do care about is explaining that fucking avatar to someone at work if they saw it on my screen.