blatantninja
Resident Redneck Facist
Comparing 3000 Americans to 50.000.000 people. That's arrogance talking right there. Osama is no worse than most leaders in the world today, he's just more in the media because he happened to kill Americans and not Africans, South Americans or Asians.
OBL is responsible for far more than 3000 Americans. Every single death in the war in Afghanistan lands right in his lap. How many deaths have occurred by the various AQ cells through out the world? Just about any death in the past 20 years attributable to Islamic extremism, he's had his hands in, either directly or indirectly. That is closer to millions, not a few thousand. Not 50MM, sure, but once you're past the few hundred thousand, I don't think the degree of evil really gets any worse.
Wrong, the brain behind 9/11 and most similar episodes is Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is expected to be the next leader of AQ.
Uhh, are you familiar with how division of labor works? OBL hadn't been the operational leader of AQ for a long time. And as I said he was "extremely charismatic and inspiring to those that were susceptible to his message of hate."
I never said he was the brains behind it. And Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was the brains behind 9/11, not al-Zawahiri.
I don't live "here in the US", I live outside it, and it's been quiet here as well. AQ has hardly done anything in recent years, and the few things they have done have been administrated and planned on a local level. There is no indication this will stop because Osama is gone.
If you live in a western country, then yes, it has been relatively quite (though Turkey has had some AQ related attacks), but AQ has been extremely active in Africa and Asia.
In fact, most terrorism isn't even related to AQ and muslims, it's usually some small group of political fanatics.
Got facts behind that? Sure, there is some political purpose to it, but AQ has aligned cells and organizations fighting in Indonesia, India, China, Somalia, and numerous other places.
Yes, and then it will continue as it did before. Nothing accomplished, except even more lives lost for a period of time.
Do you think LESS lives would have been lost if OBL was still around? If the US just pulled out of Afghanistan and let AQ have their base back? Or is it just ok with you if rather than a bunch of people in Afghanistan/Pakistan (that are harboring terrorists) die, it's civilians in the US and western Europe (and Africa and Asia since they won't stop there either) instead?
The whole war is a matter of revenge. Either that or oil.
Yeah, those oil fields of Afghanistan are just flowing!
We were attacked, we attacked back. That isn't revenge, that is defense. Know the difference.
The irony of it all is that this war of revenge is killing your own country more than it's killing anyone else - the amount of money put into warfare instead of rebuilding your nation is crazy. If American politicians wanted to actually help the people of the US, they'd invest money in schools, hospitals and jobs, not bombs and tanks.
We have enough money to do both. The problems with the US fiscal budget are not the war.
That would benefit millions of US citizens, something this neverending war will never be able to.
As someone that works in the high value target area of NYC, I am quite ok with my government spending the money to protect our soil from external threats.
The scenario is very different: During WWII, the threat was not a handful of people with limited resources - it was a "kill or be killed" situation involving various super powers.
It's really not that different. AQ and the Taliban effectively controlled Afghanistan. They had a stated goal of restoring a caliph in the middle east, with a capital in Baghdad. They have the firm belief that anywhere that has even been islamic must ALWAYS been islamic, and should be ruled by a fundamentalist state.
Adios Spain. Adios Turkey. It may have taken them them a long, long time to accomplish it, but hey our good friends in Iran managed it, so why not Iraq, or Saudi Arabia? Where would they go from there?
The world would have been a better place if someone had stopped Hitler before he came to power, or at least before he started invading other countries (*cough* Warsaw appeasement *cough*). Waiting until AQ had fomented revolutions in the Middle East would have posed a massively dangerous situation, far worse than anything we find ourselves in now.
To bring back the example you brought up with Hitler - I'm fairly certain most ignorant people out there would call it an excellent idea to kill Hitler. Perhaps if you could time it right, but overall? No, a horrible idea, as his successor would most likely be someone like Heinrich Himmler - and Germany could've won the war for all we know.
You can always make hypothetical arguments that support your position. Let's stick to facts.
OBL was an evil human being. He can no longer inspire others to do evil on his behalf. This is a good thing.