lackblogger
SasqWatch
- Joined
- November 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,778
I guess that means Metacritic and IMDb, yet again, "disproves" a certain theory
I'm not sure what you're saying here, because the IMDB for the new one is a lot lower than the first one at this stage. And the ratings tend to fall over time rather than rise as all the biggest fans go to see it sooner.
I haven't seen it yet and am not sure I will in the cinema this time as I finally feel like I'm a bit too old for this kind of movie now. I only really saw the first one out of mostly curiosity. I quite liked the first one, but, no, I wouldn't call it an 8/10 (which is its current IMDB average), but I can see why it has that score, there's an awful lot of rabbid Star Wars fans out there that have been starved of a decent movie for a very long time.
I see from your later post that you've rated the new one 8/10, which is remarkably close to its current IMDB score of 7.6/10. For a moment there I thought you'd be giving it some bizarre rating for the sole sake of continuing a forum point. My God, do people actually do that? Well, at least you've proved you're not one of them.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,778