curious
liberty or license
i had a lot of differences in my two endings since the choices and actions you make in the entire game affect all the different 'screens'. for the record i was a champion of innos (though not a true paladin as i learned no magic) my first game as well even though through my trials in the game i would have liked to have chosen adanos. i followed the path of adanos though in the 2nd game and became a druid which fit me well as i only learned magic and alchemy skills as well as weilding a staff. while many of the endings were similar i noticed quite a few more changes.
if they ever patch all the broken skills i plan on making a third go at the game though following the path of beliar might be hard as i rarely play that end of games. like wulf the stories intrigue me and i plan on trying to unravel them all though my way is the mathmatical approach of mapping them and trying to understand their meaning after i place them all in some kind of formula. (from what i made my character in nwn2 and actions i've learned i pretty much am in the 'neutral good' category though. its hard to relate those alignments to the gothic world, but i can say that i never much had much 'faith' in innos's teachings or followers, i can remember all the arrogance of the fire mages in every single gothic. their were water mages in the first gothic but no real story on adanos, or beliar really, just the sleeper. even though vatras was the only water mage in gothic 2 i liked him better than any other mage so far (putting aside xardas and milten) and was thrilled when i finally got to play the addon. the druids were 'icing on the cake' in gothic 3 as when given the option in games a druid/shaman is what i always choose first.
if they ever patch all the broken skills i plan on making a third go at the game though following the path of beliar might be hard as i rarely play that end of games. like wulf the stories intrigue me and i plan on trying to unravel them all though my way is the mathmatical approach of mapping them and trying to understand their meaning after i place them all in some kind of formula. (from what i made my character in nwn2 and actions i've learned i pretty much am in the 'neutral good' category though. its hard to relate those alignments to the gothic world, but i can say that i never much had much 'faith' in innos's teachings or followers, i can remember all the arrogance of the fire mages in every single gothic. their were water mages in the first gothic but no real story on adanos, or beliar really, just the sleeper. even though vatras was the only water mage in gothic 2 i liked him better than any other mage so far (putting aside xardas and milten) and was thrilled when i finally got to play the addon. the druids were 'icing on the cake' in gothic 3 as when given the option in games a druid/shaman is what i always choose first.