Which one now?
It's not that hard to comprehend what I was saying, but since you seem to be struggling, and since you decided to use only a partial quote, I'll spell it out.
Skyrim has a much worse reputation for bugs. You can put as much of a fanboy spin on it as you like, but that's not going to change anything. However, I have no problem taking someone's word that they experienced very few bugs because that can happen with some people even when many others are experiencing a lot more.
Take Gothic 3 for example. That game was a horrid mess when it was released, and the vast majority complained about the bugs. However, there were still some people that, for whatever reason, were able to play through the game at release and didn't have many issues. Thing is, that doesn't change the fact that it was a buggy mess.
Sure you're allowed to say so. Though nobody should expect to be taken seriously when using the same broken record to bash on the same dead horse, all the while ignoring basic facts..
So… you shouldn't be taken seriously?
Again, let's talk about bugs, but the serious ones. Quest- or game-breaking, CTDs and such. And yes, the Witcher 3 has about the same amount of them as Skyrim (both versions) has - in all three cases, about 0 compared with any other AAA-game on the market.
Sure bud.