Nereida, I know you mean well. I wonder if your point would be also be made if instead of "poor tastes" you just said "uncommon" or "peculiar"? Yes, it is certainly true that the majority of gamers would look disdainfully at some of the games RPGWatchers play, like Black Geyser, but surely you are insightful enough to know that there are people out there with peculiar tastes?
It would just be a nicer way of saying it and still get your point across and you are part of this small community. We can all be friends
Also, since I know you like Baldurs Gate I know you aren't all bad.
It's difficult for me to sugar coat my statements, for several reasons.
One reason is that sugar coating is lame. It just disguises what you are trying to say, it's deceptive, and it's false.
Another is that it lacks character. I am a person that despises the world of PR we live in, canned statements to appease as many people as possible. I like to be genuine, even if that eludes the zone of comfort of some users. The forum has a ignore option for those that can't stomach it.
Another reason is that I've been addressed in pejorative ways and name called and directly insulted time and time again, had people questioning my mental state or the worth of my life, someone directly insulted my creativity knowing that I am professional artist. Because none of those people know the first thing about me, I accept that those things were said to me, and because they seem to fall within the forum rules, I feel it's fair for me to tell them to others. There is this beautiful moment in which deliberate troll posters that insult others on regular basis turn to the moderators to beg them to censor my posts because I am being offensive to them within the rules that they stretch themselves with every post they make, but they can't stand it. And to me that is the stuff of heavens.
Ultimately, one is offended only if they choose to. If you felt offended either I wasn't addressing you and you shouldn't, or I was addressing you and you deserve it.
My conscience is clear.
EDIT/PS: The game has a 54% positive reviews in Steam. That means from users who actually own the game giving their impression on it. If you read a bit through it, you gather how the quality of the game and its systems are subpar, obtuse, and not well executed.
It's by definition a poor game ("of a low or inferior standard or quality", as per the dicionary). Liking something that is poor makes for a poor taste, or a taste in things of poor quality. I am not being offensive, I am using the correct words to define something without bias.