Both burgers look good just that some prefer a Teriyaki burger and others prefer a southwestern burger.
Correct as you may well be, you're now waaaay off point of the original point of posting burgers, something that evolved from an insinuation that sales figures = quality. I have no doubt that Maccy D's 'best' burger is likely their lowest seller… because it likely costs the most (though I'm not going to fully research that as maccy D has different menus across the entire world, it's just a 'safe' assumption, because they
all sell the dollar burger). In fact, you're kind of reinforcing the point, even within Maccy D's there's options that are better than the biggest seller, so, cheers for that.
I agree with Lev about the review.
Fallout 4 had faults, like any game, and I would have liked more RPG mechanics for sure. But I could say the same thing about pretty much any AAA RPG in the last decade or so. I'm glad they didn't go down the cutscene-cutscene-cutscene route that lots of folk like. I can understand some folk being a bit bored of the Bethesda formula, but that (for me) is not the way to go.
It was RPGWatch's #3 choice because a lot of people enjoyed playing it and therefore voted for it.
What we have here is a thread about a very long and very detailed review that highlights the many problems someone had with the game and why they consider it important to share these problems. Much as you might like the game and feel it your divine duty to protect the game from any form of criticism, it would be much more interesting and useful to your cause if you (all) actually addressed the points provided rather than consistently repeated the line "well, I enjoyed it, so there" or stopped trying to turn this into some drama that requires "you're all so mean" claptrap as the only form of response.
The only people I've read provide any insight at all to the 'wonders' of F4 since its release are Wolfgrimdark, who provided an interesting post on a stealth character, and Mylander's excellent RPGWatch review, though even Mylander admitted that many of the best points aren't necessarily RPG points.
I know it's a long read, but are you suggesting people who like F4 simply don't like to read? I wouldn't say/infer that, I would consider that a cheap shot, but I know for sure when I want to contradict someone, because I think they're wrong (not just because I feel I have to because it's a buddy thing), then I usually attempt to address the actual points of issue rather than just make bleating sounds.
Also, even when I read a review I think is cruddy about a game I enjoy I can still try to look for points where I agree with the reviewer, just out of a general respect for their humanity and to prove I'm not just making bleating noises. I haven't even played F4, I don't even want to play F4, but even I can pinpoint some areas where I think Bubbles is likely wrong, but, for the most part, he seems to be highly accurate. So when all you can do is bleat in unisome that "well, I liked it so there", are you just saying that Bubbles is right, but you don't give a shit?
)
